Order in Appeal 41 of 2015
Summary:
Consumer complaining about the demand for ACD (Additional Consumption Deposit) being excessive -- DISCOM calculating the ACD shortfall for the FY 2015-16 on an annual review based on the category of the consumer in FY 2014-15 -- Held not valid in view of the fact that ACD is a security for the payment of the present bills and that the review should confine itself to the ‘consumption’ that is recorded but not the category -- Appeal allowed